There is no question that the MAGAbertastan government of Danielle Smith caved to christofascists who are trying to erase anything that acknowledged the existence of LGBTQ+ people or that makes young children harder to sexually abuse.
Fuck them and the dogs they rode in on.
What gets me is that these kinds of people don’t seem to understand that LGBTQ+ are just people. Their neighbor’s kid could be gay, their own son could be trans, or their longtime friend of 40 years could be queer.
LGBTQ+ are not “others”, they are us. Banning books, making homosexuality illegal, taking away health care options from them won’t “make the gay go away”. It’s just something that happens, even in super oppressive states.
Ultra conservatives aren’t just jerks, they’re also stupid.
LGBTQ+ people exist, have always existed, and will always exist. If they have always existed then their existance is normal. There is nothing that anyone can do to change that.
If the 7% of us that are LGBTQ+ are abnormal are the 2% of people with naturally red hair abnormal? Are the 2% with naturally blonde hair abnormal? The 8% with blue eyes?
They absolutely understand. Right wing ideology needs to “other” people to work. They need a scapegoat that people can fear, feel superior to, look down on, or just hate. There is no better motivator than allowing people to hate, and not feel judged for it.
LGBTQ+, specifically trans people, are the best scapegoat right now. They don’t have the numbers to defend themselves. For the most part, people associate with people like themselves, thus hateful people associate with hateful people so a lot of them have never knowingly interacted with a trans person so they’re easy to manipulate into believing lies told about them.
This is precisely why the right pushes for book bans. It’s not about banning books, or protecting kids, it’s about controlling knowledge. You know what happens when you learn about something you fear? You start to understand that thing, and in turn begin to fear it less because you understand it.
The right wants you scared. Scared people don’t make rational decisions.
Please don’t associate dogs to those people. Dogs deserve better.
fuck them and the comically-oversized mosquitoes and bedbugs, glutted on the blood of children, they rode in on
FTFY
Makes young children easier to sexually abuse* ?
No. They want the young children to be easier to sexually abuse. They are trying to ban anything that makes young children harder to sexually abuse by teaching them about their bodies, sex, and consent.
I think it is intended to convey that knowledge of these things makes young children harder to sexually abuse. For example, if young boys recognize that guys can have sexual relationships with each other, they’re more inclined to question the motives of an overly nice, male stranger. The awkward phrasing makes me think the commenter just typed a little faster than he was reading and tongue(?)tied themself.
Does the addition of the word, “that” in front of, “makes young…” make my intention clearer?
They said the bans are trying to erase anything that makes young children harder to sexually abuse.
Dogs would know better than to bear such vile filth on them anywhere. These harpies congealed from the ooze that flows, like a glutinous tar, from the hearts of every despicable conservative voter in that misbegotten, backwards, armpit-of-a-province.
In a social media post on Sunday, Atwood said since the literary classic is no longer suitable in Alberta’s schools, she has written a short story for 17-year olds about two “very, very good children” named John and Mary.
“They never picked their noses or had bowel movements or zits,” she said in the beginning of her story.
“They grew up and married each other, and produced five perfect children without ever having sex.”
My gawd I love this woman! What a story!! 🤣🤣
