• rizoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Honestly this is one of the only things holding me back from going to graphene. Once this is available to non alpha users I might make the switch properly.

  • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    To me it is super weird that GrapheneOS positions itself as a way to degoogle - but it is only supported on google’s Pixel hardware.

    • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m betting it’s because Pixels have some unique hardware/ software quirks or something.

      • 0x2d@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        iirc they are the only phones that allow adding custom avb keys and then relocking the bootloader

    • nixcamic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Pixel hardware is some of the easiest to get/best/cost effective with an unlocked bootloader.

              • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 months ago

                The following devices are end-of-life, no longer receive firmware or most driver security updates and receive extended support from GrapheneOS as part of the main releases with all GrapheneOS changes including all of the latest Android Open Source Project changes:

                Pixel 5 (redfin)
                Pixel 4a (5G) (bramble)
                
    • Tikiporch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think because on other manufacturer android phones, like Samsung, you’d have to de-Google and also de-Samsung.

  • otterpop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I tried out this OS last year and really loved it, until I went on a road trip and couldn’t use Android Auto. This is huge and will make GrapheneOS an extremely attractive option to privacy minded people.

    • 🗑️😸@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think Android Auto is really the only thing keeping me from completely de-googling. Many times in the past I’ve installed some stripped down ROM or whatever but I always go back because Android Auto is too convenient.

      I wish there was a nice open source alternative that worked with my head unit.

      • jabjoe@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        So you can have Android Auto while beinging degoogled. I do. As others have pointed out there is: https://github.com/sn-00-x/aa4mg

        It’s a bit of a faff to install, but works.

        The problem I found is no SatNav that can take into account traffic. The best I’ve found is “Organic Maps”, but it is open and works without the Google infrastructure. No getting round that traffic knowledge makes Google Maps better.

        I have non AA things forcing me towards having to at least partly re-google.

        I’ve been eying GrapheneOS as a way to compromise without being compromised.

    • Dehydrated@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I generally like Louis Rossmann, but his arguments in the GrapheneOS video were beyond stupid. He says that he can’t trust GrapheneOS because it’s developed by Daniel Micay. I guess he doesn’t understand that GrapheneOS is open source and anyone can see the code. Then he switched back to the proprietary Google ROM. So he’s trusting proprietary software that’s filled with spyware over privacy-respecting open source software that can be audited by anyone.

      You don’t seem to understand the situation either and you blindly follow some YouTuber. I’d advise you to overthink your opinion on this topic.

    • saegiru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I am curious why you think that? My reasons for liking it are the fact that it essentially just works, and gives me a consistent UI across multiple vehicles. What are your issues with it?

      • The Great King Virtue Is Dead!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m just fundamentally against those tablets in cars. I’ve never seen a single good implementation of it. This first question I always have is… what can this do that my phone cant do easier, faster, and better? And 100% of the time I’ve had to ask this it has been nothing. I just use a phone grip on either my dashboard or my windshield and that accomplishes the same thing without having to use the massive, clunky, and usually dysfunctional tablet stuck on my console. Another enormous complaint is that most cars that work like this also remove aux/tape/cd and then BURY the bluetooth audio option underneath a bunch of finnicky android auto shit that has so many different problems all of which wouldn’t exist in the first place if i could just set my phone in a clamp and plugged in the aux cable. The only benefit android consoles have i can tell it has is being big if you have bad eyesight.

  • Gekoloniseerd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Is it easy to install graphenos on iOS? I got an iPhone 14. Does anyone have a good recommendation to help me through the process?