Edit 2: to everyone suggesting an SDD: i know. Look, if this guy had enough $$$ for an SSD, he could buy a used lappy less than half the age of this one that has an ssd and 2-3x the memory.

Currently, my buddy has a budget of $0, and, if he ever has money to spend, it will be on a newer computer, not upgrading this one. Thx!


My buddy’s old laptop was useless running Windows 7. I wiped it, put on Linux Mint (MATE), and it’s humming along just fine.

Edit: I really love helping people out like this. This guy is in his late 60s and has no other computer. He told me he hasn’t been able to use it in years (I believe it!), so I told him I could wipe it and make it usable again. He was thrilled!

After trying LM Cinnamon, I found it was a bit too much for this machine (Core 2 Duo “Penryn” @ 2.3GHz, 2.77GB Memory, Intel Series 4 Integrated Graphics). I reinstalled with LM MATE, and found it more responsive. I did the standard secondary installation of all the goodies like multimedia codecs, TTF support, battery tweaks, etc. I set up snapshots and the firewall, and installed UBlock Origin in Firefox. I updated everything. Shockingly, the battery still gets about 90-120 minutes, which blows my mind. The damn thing is 18 years old!

So, it’s still slow to launch stuff, as it’s running off of a slow HDD, but it manages to run most things just fine. It’s certainly far more responsive than Win7, and it enables my buddy to enjoy safe, secure, and modern web browsing (which is pretty much all he uses it for).

  • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    A little trick you can do if your friend experiences too much memory limitations when browsing the web is to use the 32 bit version of firefox. I use it in a machine with only 2gb, and it helped a lot.

    • gregorum@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Agreed (although bumping the memory to 4 or 8GB would arguably boost performance similarly, given that it’s only got 2.77GB (?) somehow. With such teeny-weeny amounts of memory, more RAM would be almost equally useful to an SSD, although both would be ideal.

      Problem is: my old buddy has $0. If he even had $50, he could have bought himself a much newer laptop than this one, lol! So, we’re working with what we’ve got.

      Also: he will never do more with it than browsing the web. He’s an old boi, and his needs are minimal. He’s thrilled that he has an option for using “the internet” (Gmail, Facebook, and some tart he’s chatting with on Wire— who I believe may be scamming him, but that’s another convo) other than his tiny phone screen.

    • gregorum@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      AkTuALly:

      In this particular instance, due to the microscopic amount of memory in the machine (even for the day, when 4GB was considered “minimum”, this lappy has… 2.77GB?), more memory would probably impact performance just as much as an SSD.

      But, yeah, and SSD would increase app launch performance and other HDD-centric tasks a great deal. But more memory would allow more apps to cache in active memory and quick-launch after first-launch. This might be a better and more cost-effective “first upgrade” before going SSD.

      Also, this dude is in no position to spend money on this machine, so I’m doing what I can to make the most of what he has.

        • codemonk@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Fun fact: The machine might even have more RAM. I also had an laptop with a Core 2 Duo. The mainboard supported up to 4GB of RAM. However, the BIOS only supported 3GB (for whatever reason). Around 200MB are used for the iGPU. That left me with 2.8GB of RAM out of 4GB.

        • gregorum@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Oh! That’s it!

          The reporting was just weird. Ok, thanks for that!

      • Guest_User@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Just playing devils advocate but a faster drive would allow better page caching even with the low ram which is probably already happening on that terribly slow HDD.

        • gregorum@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Sufficient memory = very little/no paging

          And it would be cheaper (for this vintage of ram)

          You’re not wrong, but it’s a matter of priorities: the memory is the biggest problem with this machine and it can’t be made up for with any other resource, except, sometimes, swap/paging. But more memory is the answer to that issue, not an SSD, and more memory would solve a lot of other performance issues that only more memory can solve.

          But, of course, an SSD would bring many of its own benefits (including, yes, faster paging/swap). These, however, are far less likely to benefit this particular user, especially considering that they’re more expensive.

    • gregorum@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      no landfills here in Florida, they just burn the e-waste and pump the fumes into the local orphanariums, selling it as “Vytameens™".

  • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    If hardware/budget allow it, you might want to throw in a cheap SSD and some more RAM. Something like 50€ could greatly improve usability.

    • gregorum@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      He knows how to browse the web, which is quite literally the only thing he will ever be doing with this machine

      He didn’t know how to use windows, which is what was on it before, so I don’t really see the issue on putting on a different operating system that actually works for him. Especially considering that this new operating system is modern, safe, and secure, and contains all of, the most contemporary security features.

      He doesn’t need to know how to use all of the intricacies of the operating system. He just needs a functional, basic, web-ready workstation, and that’s what he has now.

        • gregorum@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          He apologized profusely for putting me out so much for all the work I put into it. I just told him: some guys like to work on old cars as a hobby to unwind. And some people like to work on old computers.

          The benefit is that, with old computers, I can take your old computer into my garage, fix it up, and then hand it back to you without feeling any obligation about doing it for free.

          It’s not a fucking car.

          • SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I set up a linux laptop for my three year old. He plays Putt-Putt, Commander Keen, and Wolfenstein 3D. You’re never too old to get into computing!

    • gregorum@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      We’re in Florida, so no landfill— they’d just burn it and pump the exhaust into local orphanages, sold as “Vytameenz™”

      • Mac@federation.red
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Fortunately, I did not have that happen before it met the wrath of 8oz of ice cold water

  • e-five@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Any reason MATE over Xcfe? Just curious if the performance is close or MATE is better at things, not trying to question your decisions. I have a >9 year old PC at this point and installed Cinnamon on it but was finding it a bit laggy. I tried out the other editions but am sticking with LMDE for now, but sort of feel like I don’t really need nice animations, I just need more CPU for faster compile times, haha

    • gregorum@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      XFCE is so ugly and clunky, I wouldn’t ever suggest that a Linux novice ever use it. It’s fucking horrific. It’s a user interface you choose when you have no other choice and are just that desperate. Suffice to say, I wasn’t that desperate.

      It was important that this user have an interface that he could navigate easily, an XFCE was not that interface, nor will it ever be.

  • verassol@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Recently did something similar and yeah it seems Mint, specially LMDE in my case, is a great fit for such cases. It’s on that sweet spot between being too bare and too bloated.

  • codemonk@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Such a great project. Bringing joy to a friend and reduce e-waste at the same time. Love it. Would give away the SSD from my old Core 2 Duo based laptop (which got replaced by a used Gen4 i7 laptop from my company when they sold the devices to employees for very little money. Now they are giving them to schools for free, which is great). Sending it around half the planet is neither free nor sustainable, though. Would be cheaper to buy a new one. But maybe you find someone to help out. For me, an SSD was a great improvement for that old machine. As stated in another comment, upgrading RAM did not work in that particular case.