Highlights:
- Rakuten Drive offers free 10GB storage and unlimited file transfers, unlike competitors.
- Integrates with Microsoft 365 for document viewing and editing.
- Targets both individuals and businesses with separate plans.
- Paid “PRO” version increases storage to 1TB, allows bigger file uploads, and extends transfer link expiration.
- Future integration with Rakuten’s loyalty program planned.
unlimited file transfers, unlike competitors.
Looking into my crystal ball…
I give this 2-3 months before file transfers are limited due to multi-terrabyte daily transfers from accounts hosting pirated media.
…or just due to plain old corporate greed enshittification.
Nah, that will come 3 months later when to keep providing a world class service they will have to discontinue the free accounts.
But don’t worry, they will give existing customers great upgrade deals.
I am inclined to think the privacy protections on this would be awful.
Encrypt everything before uploading it.
For 10 GB of storage? Meh. It feels like setting this up would be a headache unless someone really needed it for something iffy. It’s so tiny.
1TB for $8/month isn’t bad. Cheaper than Google anyway.Never mind, it’s actually more expensive than Google and others. See below.I’d rather go for something with E2EE anyway.
Hetzner Storagebox is $3.5/M for 1TB
What are you basing that off of??
Google is 2TB for $10/month.
$8.33/month with the annual plan.
This says $20/month. https://one.google.com/about/plans
Is there a cheaper drive-only option?
The page you linked shows an annual plan of 100$ for 2 TB which means 8.33 per month.
Doh, I misread. I saw $20 and thought that was the monthly price, but that’s actually for 2 months, before annual discount. Never mind.
So…yeah, who is Rakuten trying to compete with?
Cryptomator is free and about as easy as encryption comes.
10 Gigabytes! That are almost two 4K movies with heavy compression.
Oh, boy! As an American consumer, I’m even more perplexed what the hell they are.
Like 15 years ago, Rakuten seemed to be a normal ecommerce site. I think they bought buy.com or something to get a foothold in the US market. Then they pivoted to being some sort of cashback referral service.
I’m not really sure why that would lead customers to think “yeah, I want cloud storage from the people who made a weird janky digital simulation of the Piggly Wiggly Value Club Card!”
(AWS made it work because they could say “we have the infrastructure to host one of the busiest sites on earth, it’s good enough for you”, but Rakuten does not have that credibility in the US)
Removed by mod
They also bought Kobo, a Kindle competitor that I actually like. (Partially because you can still easily remove their DRM).
The hardware is better, too. It’ll be a cold day in hell before I go back to a Kindle.
SaaSS (service as a software substitute) bullshit
It is common for SaaSS dis-services to charge a monthly fee for use. Usually one SaaSS site does not substitute for another, so if users become unhappy with one dis-service provider it is no easy matter to switch to another. When users become dependent on one, it can gouge them at will with repeated small price increases that over time add up to a lot. We view the loss of freedom inherent in SaaSS as worse than the cost in money, but when a dis-service has you over a barrel, the cost can be painful. Thus, even users who don’t see deeper than the bottom line should beware of SaaSS.
Businesses should host their own servers.
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/who-does-that-server-really-serve.en.html
deleted by creator
Nobody’s saying to host it on-premises. The SaaSS article is advocating running software that you control on servers that you control. That’s it. The server is likely in a datacenter, and its hardware could be owned by the datacenter, the customer, or someone else. It could be a virtualized host.
The SaaSS article is about software and services, not hardware.
Speedrunning Dropbox, box.com, …
If they support webdav then it means free 10gb swap “ram”
Who is this even for? 10 gigs is a rounding era in drive space.
People aren’t storing massive amounts of data on cloud storage. For text document storage or even a moderate number of images, 10 GB is enough for many people.
Rakuten are the ones who make Kobo, a Kindle competitor that’s more popular outside of the US - I have a Kobo.
Likely this is to eventually integrate into their Kobo device offerings, to let you upload your own .epubs (as opposed to Amazon .mobi). 10GB may be small fish for everything else but for ebook storage it’s more than you’d ever need.
Ah makes sense
And what protocols do they support?
For personal backups I can recommend Jottacloud, although they only have servers in Norway.
Is it 10 Gigabyte or Terabyte?
I have literally never heard of this company before and it sounds like particularly unsubtle Indian scammers
Headline:
One of Japan’s largest tech companies just launched its own cloud storage service
Yeah but I can’t be bothered to google it so it must be a scam.
They have a whole bunch of purchases, the one I’m familiar with is Kobo years ago
deleted by creator
They took over a UK company called Play.com that was big in the 2010s for cheap CD purchases.
Play.com was the shit.
I get it, you don’t watch football/soccer.
