Having never owned a house or really had a yard of my own, I got pretty excited and decided to do some ad-hoc landscaping. Built some raised beds for vegetables, and just laying in some organic shaped in-ground beds for low water decorative plants. Gonna fill the rest in with gravel. Any pointers?

  • cooljimy84@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Not sure on your location as from the picture it doesn’t look like you’re in the USA. However some places have restrictions on gathering water from your roof due to the materials used to clad the roof being poisonous. I would just double check that as I wouldn’t want to consume any fruits or vegetables that have been grown in water that wasn’t safe. I would also use a water butt or gatherer rather (totally covered from sun light) than hosing directly into a plant bed as if it’s raining. The plants will already be getting watered from the rainwater so you want to store the rainwater for use later.

    • Harriet_Porber@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      store the rainwater for use later.

      And then there are even further rules on storing water in some places - in Colorado I’m only allowed ~100 gallons of rainwater collection storage because someone else owns the water rights to the land my house is on.

      • d2k1@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        This is bewildering. Are you really subject to regulations that forbid you from storing and using rain water as you see fit? Because you must buy water from a third party?

        Is there a reason behind this other than capitalism?

        • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Yeah I can’t even think of a secondary or tertiary reason.

          Unless it’s to stop people from storing it and using it inside? But even than… so my thought on that one is overall maintenance.

          In my city you get charged 30% iirc of your water use for sanitary use, so that pays for waste water treatment and maintenance of sewer lines. It’s not a full 100% because people water the yards and other stuff, and it’s not feasible to measure waste discharge.

          So the only reason I could think of with, is so people aren’t getting around water fees and therefore sewer maintenance fees.

          But it’s probably capitalism instead of trying to maintaining infrastructure.

          • Harriet_Porber@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Water rights in the Western US are wild. I wrote a small rant above if you’re interested. There is very legitimately not enough fresh water to go around from rivers like the Colorado to support continued agriculture and population expansion. (I blame agriculture 10x more than population, but that’s my hot take)

            • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Oh yeah shit downstream water would be huge. Retaining that water prevents it from being available from watershed.

              I’m right next to the Rockies and we get glacier melt and snow melt. So it’s weird seeing those restrictions elsewhere where we don’t have them but being basically the same geographically. BUT we were on water rationing last year to save the reservoir level, but the city also provides a rain barrel program, and no limits as far as I know/saw.

              Linky

              • Harriet_Porber@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Wow, great to see a government encouraging it instead of saying you can’t do it! I’m also right next to the Rockies just far south of you in Colorado, and we get very different messages.

                It is weird. Like if every house had 200 gallons of storage, that could add up to a small dam’s worth of storage at almost no cost to the government. It makes more sense to me to encourage houses to store it.

                It really might come back around to blame capitalism - since like 90% of water is used for agriculture here maybe the downstream money makers are the ones yelling the loudest.

                • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  I think we are super blessed where we live. The government actually seems to care about the environment, does stuff about it, pushes for code compliance like no other, and has some of the best resources I’ve seen. You’ve got water data, tree data, a state of the art composting facility with free public compost, programs out the Wazhoo.

                  Tree database p

  • Madison420@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Wood right next to the house is a big no no. Termites are an issue you want to avoid as much as possible.

    Route the downspout away from the house, it looks like it’s aimed at your foundation and downgrade so water will want to come back towards the house.

    • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Termites aren’t an issue everywhere though.

      The downspout should be discharged atleast 3 if not 5 feet from the house though. BUT that looks like garage? So slab on grade and not as much as a concern, but still not ideal.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        In Colorado they are. And that appears to be their location.

        A slab will float almost as well as a bathtub.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes, you can’t help that. You can help but spacing any extraneous word at least 3ft from the house is the general rule of thumb.

    • rektdeckard@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It is a slab-on-grade garage, and yes I plan on adding a rainwater catchment ASAP. The downspout has been exactly in this position for 12 years when the previous owners built the garage, and has caused no issues – at least none that came up in inspection. There’s very good drainage down to the road behind, I think.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean the flex tube pointing into your raised bed, it should point away and closer to the middle where the should be a shallow valley graded away from both. It probably wouldn’t come up on inspection, a. Most home inspections aren’t that great, b. You’d really need a significant amount of water to be around to judge it proper. Other than that I can’t see any real problems with the beds being there or their design or anything.