

Oh, you know, I didn’t even realize you replied to yourself.


Oh, you know, I didn’t even realize you replied to yourself.


Okay, so you’re saying that although the editor made a mistake or was biased, but unlike a lot of other resources, they have to show their sources, so if you care to look, you can see if it is true?
If so, I think that makes sense.


How is it not? Genuine question, I use wiki a lot, and generally trust the articles, though I have seen some inaccuracies before.
Brown and gray? They must have changed some stuff since I last visited.


Many people are unaware of the technology that goes into millimeter wave scanners, and although harmless physically, they are quite invasive in a privacy sense (by definition), and I don’t criticize her for refusing to use one, even if by faulty reasoning.


It can happen. Systemic absorption as opposed to only local effects of eye drops can have a big impact, and if you’re trying to poison someone, you’re probably putting in most of a bottle of eye drops (5-15ml) instead of the few drops you would put in your eye, so potentially a ~100x higher dose.
Just thinking briefly about it, I think the more dangerous eye drops would cause lower blood pressure if taken orally or potential kidney problems depending on the drug.
It would probably have to be a high dose to seriously affect a healthy young person, but an older person or someone with underlying health issues or other interacting medications could more easily be affected.

I don’t think the article is arguing that the wood banks should just go away, but that they shouldn’t be necessary, and their expansion is a symptom of the failing system.
It’s the “orphan-crushing machine” again. People band together to do something good that needs to be done because of systemic failures, and most reporting on it focuses on the good done instead of talking about fixing the systemic failures. This article is just the response to that, a different way of looking at the same event.


I agree it has a bad taste because of the historical power structure, but it’s honestly similar to this. Some languages just look funny to English speakers since they are partially mutually intelligible.
Yeah I really hope we figure out some metadata, chain of custody, or something cool like this structured lighting idea to clearly identify real and fake images and video soon.
I thought the same, but it’s definitely Sora-generated
Yeah, a pretty common prompt it looks like. I gotta be more on the lookout for this crap.
https://youtube.com/shorts/vY9sKc3Zt14
https://youtube.com/shorts/t0Yhak4Y93U
Probably based on this real video from years ago:
Stevens-Johnson isn’t specific to nsaids, it’s been linked to lots of drugs, but more commonly certain antibiotic or anticonvulsant classes. Extremely rare though, around 5 cases in a million person-years.