• ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    /c/fuckcars : “use some other form of transportation!”

    Also /c/fuckcars: “No! Not like that!”

    • Michal@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Why not? Less risk of being hit by a plane if they’re in the sky and requirements for a pilot license are much stricter. In a plane crash occupants are more likely to die than innocent bystanders, compared to cars that are designed for safety only for those on the inside.

      • elephantium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why not? Probably because:

        Bike pollution: .

        Car pollution: oooooooooo

        Plane pollution: OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOO

        (bike pollution is slightly more than nil just because of the CO2 we breathe out while riding)

  • FlashZordon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Must be lovely to hear your neighbor fire up their Cessna at 7 in the morning for their morning commute.

  • Ian@Cambio@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Little known fact. Airplanes still use leaded fuel. I’ll bet that the blood levels for all of these families are elevated. Not a great place to raise a kid.