• gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Because the VP doesn’t generally realistically differ from the president’s stance on things, until the president is either term-limited or isn’t running as the incumbent. Harris has the actual agency to define her own policies now, and we are seeing her publicize those as they become relevant to current and active situations.

      • walden@sub.wetshaving.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s a really good point which I hadn’t considered.

        Still, I’d call Israel her first political test. That was in the news for the past few days.

  • adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 months ago

    tl;dr: a couple whiny billionaires want the ftc chair gone because the commission looks a little too closely in their general direction.

    it is not however newsworthy. she ain’t president yet. and replacing biden appointments outside of the cabinet would not even be close to a top priority.

  • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    Better fuckin defend her. I’ll still vote for Harris, but Lina Khan is the best thing to ever happen to modern governance.