Hello,
There was a recent port that was made to Libreboot for the Dell Optiplex 9020 MT, and I was not properly credited for the work that I did. I made a pull request on Codeberg with my patch (github basically) and labeled it as ‘WIP’. Leah and I were working on this together during that time, and I was told to wait a week, so I did. Time passes and guess what? They closed off my patch and added it themselves a week later with no credit given to me.
I made the .ROM files for the 9020 MT motherboard, I tested them, and they didn’t work until Leah came in and resized the IFD and GBE regions. That was all that they did. Everything else, I did on my own, I added the entries in /vendor/sources for MRC/ME, and added it to lbmk. Leah is now refusing to accept my patch that’s fixed.
I’m not trying to steal all the glory from them, they did help, I just want partial credit for utilizing the port from coreboot gerit. This port was originally made in Coreboot by someone, so work mostly goes to them, but as for adding support for Libreboot, my name is completely left out. I just feel wronged because now they’re saying that I don’t deserve to have my name on this because I was too slow when I was only given a week and was literally told to wait during that time period, so I was kind of manipulated into waiting so that Leah could get the board herself and add it without ever including my name.
I spent a week working on this, and I let them know how significant this was to me, only to have my work shitted on and not properly credited. I’m now banned from IRC and Libreboot for talking about this on Mastadon. I’m just ranting because I feel like my work was just stolen. This is the most powerful desktop supported by Libreboot and now I’m left in the back pages where no one can see my name, which says ‘Provided testing hardware for the 9020 MT’ when I did much more than just testing. I was the one who made this port.
Yes, but the patch that I made after that didn’t go through because they closed off my original patch. I don’t think I have a bruised ego for just wanting proper credit. How are you going to tell me its okay for someone to just make someone wait a week, close off their patch, and take all the credit? This was intentional from Leah and it’s pretty obvious. I do care about the project and open computing, the only reason I said I wanted this to go on my resume is because I literally have no job and am looking for a career in IT.
Almost all of the code I can find around the Optiplex 9020 seems to be based of this coreboot patch from a few years ago. I find it difficult to see the code you added, though, as the tar.gz on Codeberg seems to be a complete copy of libreboot.
Do you have a side-by-side of the code that you contributed versus the code Leah contributed?
I do feel sorry for you but not for the reasons you seem so obsessed about. I’ve been unemployed and trying to make opportunities for myself that didn’t come through. I’ve felt like I burned my one and only chance, several times. It’s rough pulling yourself up by the small hairs and trying again, but trust me. This isn’t the way.
It’s obvious to you in your current situation, I’m sure, but take a breath and distance yourself just a moment. You’re clearly hurt but this is the makings of a paranoid delusion. Is the lead of an open source project intentionally persecuting and exploiting random volunteers, or just you specifically? Is that lead of an open source project with us in the room now?
Look, counterpoint: It’s fairly clear to me that you put a lot of expectation and hope on this opportunity to ship a working patch, and you saw the collaboration with Rowe as a sort of mentoring relationship where they’d coach your patch through to a working state. And after that you’d have that on your CV and all the doors to employment would open.
However, your work was (not stolen but) rejected — and you have been given clear explanations why the project lead chose not to use your work, not least that it bricked the device it was made for.
You need to acknowledge two things, both of them starting with “this isn’t all about you”: 1. Rowe had a different understanding of your collaboration, where they as a project lead were more concerned with shipping a working patch, any working patch, than with tutoring your process; and 2. The fault is with you for expecting Rowe to delay shipping and not use a fix they came up with themself in favour of your work. You handed in a patch that didn’t work and Rowe looked for other solutions as any good project manager should. End of.
You’ve seen an opportunity fall away and, although that is always a blow to someone starting a career, you need to move on. At this point you’re just tilting at windmills and making up reasons that somebody else is to blame. Nobody stole your work (not in a way that you seem willing to prove), you were given credit to the extent that your work was useful to the project.
Now do what you would have done if your work had been accepted: put the credit on your resume, keep looking for work and — I hope — more voluntary software work.
They made me wait that’s what the problem is, I had a functioning patch, and they closed off my original patch and added it themselves. I just really don’t think its fair for someone to do that. I mean, them telling me to wait a week just so they can close off my patch and take most of the credit? I think that’s wrong.
Yes, I saw the lines you repeated over and over again. I’m starting to see why Rowe blocked you.
Your next big project should be to step away from the keyboard and get the fuck to work on yourself. Your egomania is the problem here, nobody owes you anything.
Until someone makes you wait on purpose just so they can take all the credit for the project you were working on, bet you would feel the same way I do.
Buddy… leah took credit for their own work. Anyone could’ve contributed a better patch than you in that week. You don’t get first dibs on feature contributions and you certainly don’t get a free pass to harass Foss maintainers when they prioritise better functional code than you’re own. Take the L. Move on.
I want to clarify that the patch I submitted was a work in progress. On two separate occasions, I sought guidance regarding when to submit it and was instructed to wait for a week. The understanding was that Leah and I would continue working on it during the following week. Unfortunately, the patch got accidentally closed during that waiting period.
My communication was bad and I understand that I need to do better. The comment Leah made about being ‘too slow’ contradicts the circumstances, as I followed the guidance to wait for input during the specified timeframe.
That was your understanding. Clearly leah understood something else. And nothing youce shared so far excuses you’re actions. I repeat. Move on. Do something productive with your time.