Hello,

There was a recent port that was made to Libreboot for the Dell Optiplex 9020 MT, and I was not properly credited for the work that I did. I made a pull request on Codeberg with my patch (github basically) and labeled it as ‘WIP’. Leah and I were working on this together during that time, and I was told to wait a week, so I did. Time passes and guess what? They closed off my patch and added it themselves a week later with no credit given to me.

I made the .ROM files for the 9020 MT motherboard, I tested them, and they didn’t work until Leah came in and resized the IFD and GBE regions. That was all that they did. Everything else, I did on my own, I added the entries in /vendor/sources for MRC/ME, and added it to lbmk. Leah is now refusing to accept my patch that’s fixed.

I’m not trying to steal all the glory from them, they did help, I just want partial credit for utilizing the port from coreboot gerit. This port was originally made in Coreboot by someone, so work mostly goes to them, but as for adding support for Libreboot, my name is completely left out. I just feel wronged because now they’re saying that I don’t deserve to have my name on this because I was too slow when I was only given a week and was literally told to wait during that time period, so I was kind of manipulated into waiting so that Leah could get the board herself and add it without ever including my name.

I spent a week working on this, and I let them know how significant this was to me, only to have my work shitted on and not properly credited. I’m now banned from IRC and Libreboot for talking about this on Mastadon. I’m just ranting because I feel like my work was just stolen. This is the most powerful desktop supported by Libreboot and now I’m left in the back pages where no one can see my name, which says ‘Provided testing hardware for the 9020 MT’ when I did much more than just testing. I was the one who made this port.

  • Quintus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I personally think that this merely a miscommunication on Leah’s part. If I were you, I would just let it go. From what I understand, Leah remade the patch herself so no work was stolen?

    Sure you might feel wronged for being told to wait for a week and that’s natural! But as I stated, this was just a miscommunication in my opinion.

    This situation is not worth stressing yourself over. You’re salty over Leah calling your work “shit”? Work/study harder and improve upon yourself. If I were you, this is what I would gather from all this.

    Also, Leah saying “Accepy my authority” is pretty ironic for someone in the FOSS community.

    • heartsofwar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago
      • Its pretty easy to remake a patch when a rough draft was previously created by someone else; so I’m not sure the point is valid in stating Leah didn’t steal any work. Can you prove that claim?

      • As easy as it is for them to “let it go” it would be just as easy for Leah to add them as a contributor…