I have met a couple of them in real life, and a few I have met online. The sample is not significant enough to draw any conclusions about their point of view and background.

I am more than interested in your opinions about the personality and political makeup of people who express this type of pro-C bigotry.

  • flashgnash@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    It’s crazy to me that people don’t do this, once you’ve learned a few languages you can basically just pick up new ones straight away (assuming they don’t use entirely foreign concepts like Rust does)

    • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      27 days ago

      Which foreign concepts do Rust use? The borrow checker/ownership is new but that’s really the only thing that doesn’t already exist in some other language.

      • flashgnash@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        The borrow checker, the way it handles exceptions and nulls, the way it handles stack/heap (possibly foreign to me because I’ve never done much on C), composition pattern instead of oop, probably more I’m forgetting

        • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          26 days ago

          The borrow checker

          This is indeed pretty unique.

          the way it handles exceptions and nulls

          This is really just the fact that Rust has sum types - but those kinds of types have been used in many functional languages (Haskell for example) for a long time.

          the way it handles stack/heap

          This is just the same as C and C++ and any other low-level language that requires you to distinguish between the stack and heap.

          composition pattern instead of oop

          I mean if you’re only looking at OOP languages then this will be new, but functional languages have done this for a long time.

          So yea, I think a big part of what makes Rust great is that it has managed to take these really, really good ideas from functional programming languages and made them work in a language that is not entirely functional. This leads to a perfect blend/best of both worlds with regards to OOP and functional programming :)

          • locuester@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            24 days ago

            Yeah it’s just the borrow checker and ownership stuff that throws you for a loop. Particularly with large system design

    • locuester@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      Rust can be picked up the same way. I was in the situation you describe. Knew a dozen languages. Picked up rust and really enjoy it. It added a dimension to my thinking (ownership). I feel closer to the metal yet safe. That said, it still gets tricky with system design. That’s where it’s a lot harder due to ownership stuff. Just syntax wise it’s not bad tho

      • flashgnash@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        It might be because I’d never used C but I really struggled to pick up rust for a month or so until it stopped feeling like