• DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    And this involves only driving in summer when there is excess energy? Or getting through winter by storing enough hydrogen to make the Beirut explosion look like a firecracker in comparison?

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      That’s funny, but modern solar panel power plants don’t care that it’s winter. The panels rotate and an arid area isn’t getting that much more cloud cover.

      • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        The article says the ones it talks about do. Also, rotating panels can’t stop days from being shorter during winter.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          16 days ago

          I’m not saying it’s not lower. I’m saying it’s not nearly as big of a deal as people say it is.

              • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                16 days ago

                So we are not using it for cars, but to make electricity at night? Just even less efficiently than hydro pumped power? Ok…

                • phx@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  16 days ago

                  Hydroelectric is great where it is available, but it’s again limited by landscape and other factors in use

      • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        That sounds fun. Not only are we already losing ton of energy to create the hydrogen, we can now lose even more and make it more expensive by trying to liquefy/compress it to make it somewhat transportable. [1]

        Also, almost 90% of humans living in the northen hemisphere will surely not cause any issues to this plan. [2]

        • phx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          16 days ago

          You’re not LOSING anything if it’s capturing already excess energy, which would by its nature be lost if not used at the time of generation

          • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            16 days ago

            Neither solar panels, nor hydrogen generators are free. If you need to build extra panels and hydrogen generators, you are making the infrastructure more expensive, consequently raising electricity prices. Or hydrogen prices if you use it as fuel instead of power storage.