Sure, there are always outliers and you can correct me if I’m wrong, but that’s just the overall impression I have.

(I wasn’t sure if !asklemmy@lemmy.world or this community would fit better for this kind of question, but I assume it fits here.)

  • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    8 days ago

    Echo chambers are never good, no matter the politics. Just reading this comment thread is proof. Some of these comments are fucking ridiculous.

      • Deceptichum@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Oh no, the poor right whingers aren’t being represented here.

        Oh wait, good. Fuck ‘em.

        • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          They still have to suffer from shiti health insurance…

          But sure let’s make sure nobody but a good neo libs “allies” are permitted here champ

          • OpenStars@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            Totally. Maybe we should invent some kind of… oh I dunno, ideological purity test? Surely that would not eat our faces off, hrm? Surely we can exclude only “them”, while keeping “us”.

            Smh, it’s always the same. People don’t even see it.

          • Deceptichum@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            In your country sure.

            And who the fuck wants neo libs here? Neo libs (and libs) are right wing ideologies.

      • Chozo@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Weird seeing you again, and seeing you say this, after you quickly resorted to name-calling over a disagreement in another thread just 20 minutes ago. Do you really not think that you’re a member of the half you refer to? I’m not so sure you actually want “diversity of opinions” or “normal people” if that’s been your response so far.

        • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          You took a bad position, I clarified why it was unfounded.

          That’s called a discussion. You are entitled to post your opinion, I am entitled to provide a rebuttal.

          That’s how discourse works.