• Grapho@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s imperialism if it has the characteristics of imperialism, wishing it really hard because that’s a word that would be an amazing gotcha isn’t enough. Imperialism is, to really overly simplify it: the extraction of surplus value, often in the form of labor through financial instruments from one country to another. Russia’s position in the world is not that of imperialist extraction (except in the participation prior to the sanctions in the western financial sector) since capital was still consolidating its power over the working class in Russia, given that its capitalist system (another western imposition) wasn’t developed enough to do so, and it was still mostly an export economy.

    Now, I eagerly await for the flat-earth level analysis of “but I see it and I think it is imperialist”.

    • Ciderpunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I mean, we agree, Russia intends to exploit Ukraine’s natural gas reserves in the regions they are occupying, which definitely meets the definition you set out so…

      Unless you’re insisting that Russia is going to just give that territory up after all this, despite them claiming they have a hereditary right to it all, because they just really wouldn’t want to accidentally profit off taking over their neighbors territory in which case, it sounds like the “flat earth level analysis” is coming from inside the house.