• some_dude@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Probably in the minority here and I’m not a fan of establishment Democrats, but his reasoning that Trump would use the shutdown to move without court interference seemed logical to me.

    • heraplem@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Even so, the way Schumer handled this was just awful. Vulnerable Democrats in the House stuck their necks out to vote against the CR. Then Schumer acted like he was going to filibuster it, but it was really just a procedural ruse. He burned his colleagues in the House and the Democratic base. If he was going to allow the CR to proceed, then he should have been signalling that since the beginning, and he certainly should never have acted like he was going to block it.

      Also, as a personal matter, the tone that Schumer has been taking really grates on me. His solution is always to just roll over and let the Republicans do whatever. Maybe that’s the rational thing to do, reasonable minds can disagree, but he always seems so smug about it, as if that were obviously correct, and anyone who suggests that we should fight is a moron.

      And whenever I hear him talk, I never get a sense of urgency. It’s as if nothing that’s going on really bothers him, and he’s 100% certain that things will turn out just fine like they always have. And that’s just objectively not true. Regardless of what our strategy should be, Trump is doing irreversible damage. Even if we end up winning the House in 2026 and the Presidency in 2028, our international reputation is going to be completely fucked for at least a decade, and very likely longer than that. Schumer should be worried, even if only for his own self-interest, because the system that has been so good to him is at risk of collapsing.

      Even if he made the rational move in allowing the CR to proceed, I really think he’s just not a good leader or spokesperson for the party.

      • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        And whenever I hear him talk, I never get a sense of urgency. It’s as if nothing that’s going on really bothers him, and he’s 100% certain that things will turn out just fine like they always have.

        They’ve all sounded like that for my entire life as I watched the world fall apart around me.

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      12 hours ago

      You know Trump could have just vetoed the spending bill and then got his shutdown right? Or the Republicans could have not submitted a bill or even voted against with that argument that it was better for Trump to have his way.

      This has just legitimized him further in that when push comes to shove people (Democrats) do agree with giving him what he wants. He’s an unchecked bully.
      This is not logical it’s easy.

      • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Whoever shuts down the government, loses. Republicans can’t just veto the bill or not pass a budget. But they CAN pass something Democrats don’t like and then blame Democrats for shutting down the government if they filibuster it. And voters WOULD blame Democrats, because they would be the party blocking the bill.

        Run through the logic, after they stop this budget. Trump does whatever he wants while people blame Democrats, and eventually the Democrats cave and pass it anyway after allowing irreperable harm and harming their ability to take back the House in 2026, or they cave by letting Trump whatever he wants indefinitely.

        • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 hours ago

          The fascists will do what they want either way. They only use laws when it is convenient for them to do so.

          What the fascists wanted was to be legitimized by bipartisan support of their bill. They wanted the Democrats to consent in advance. To take the next small step willingly.

          Chuck Schumer has handed the country over to the fascists in exchange for nothing because he serves the same billionaires.

          There wasn’t a sudden realization from Schumer that flipped his opposition on Wednesday to his support on Thursday. That was his obvious cover to try to hide the billionaires he serves. Don’t fall for it.

          Whoever controls the messaging can blame the other party for the shutdown. Democrats don’t bother to even have a narrative let alone control one. They fight in a strictly performative way. So no matter what happens Republicans can always blame Democrats and without an alternative view point pushed people who aren’t politically engaged are more likely to believe Republicans.

          The ten Democrat Senators who voted for the CR do not care about winning. They care about raising their donors’ stock portfolios.

          • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 minutes ago

            The fascists will do what they want either way. They only use laws when it is convenient for them to do so.

            If that’s your actual stance, then none of what Schumer or any Democrat does, matters at all.

            What the fascists wanted was to be legitimized by bipartisan support of their bill. They wanted the Democrats to consent in advance. To take the next small step willingly.

            In what world is this the thing that matters? You’re really saying fascists would do whatever they want regardless of all laws or institutions, but…not really, the one man holding them back was Chuck Schumer, minority leader in the Senate.

            Chuck Schumer has handed the country over to the fascists in exchange for nothing because he serves the same billionaires.

            I see how you’re getting here, he does fund raise from Democratic billionaires, but the Internet Leftist urge to just dismiss anyone with any political power as not ideologically pure enough and thus the enemy puts such a small ceiling on the movement in terms of actual political results. Nothing to do with this comment thread it’s just something that annoys me.

            There wasn’t a sudden realization from Schumer that flipped his opposition on Wednesday to his support on Thursday. That was his obvious cover to try to hide the billionaires he serves. Don’t fall for it.

            He flipped overnight, ok. What’s the more likely scenario, he got some overnight polling that showed people were going to blame the Democrats for the shutdown so he switched out of political necessity, or he…secretly agreed with the Republicans the whole time but decided to pretend to oppose it for exactly one day for no reason.

            Whoever controls the messaging can blame the other party for the shutdown. Democrats don’t bother to even have a narrative let alone control one.

            Voters are not dumb, they just don’t all agree with you politically. They blamed Congressional Republicans in the Ted Cruz shutdown over Obamacare, and they blamed Trump in the shutdown over the Wall. Because those are the people who caused it. In this case, it would be the Democrats forcing a shutdown.

    • ubergeek@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 hours ago

      This CR gives Musk a ticket to do whatever he wants, anyways.

      So, why give him money to do it?

    • xye@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I see the logic behind it, but cant decide if the system is now so broken that his logic even works in the new framework.