anders@rytter.me to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 6 months agoStupid people always say norytter.meimagemessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageStupid people always say norytter.meanders@rytter.me to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 6 months agomessage-square44fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaredream_weasel@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·6 months agoThere is no try, only do or do not!
minus-squareℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-26 months agoAll !do is do not (!do); all do is do. [law of non-contradiction]. All try = do or !do [succeeds or fails, proven by observation] Therefore, no try != Not (do or !do) Therefore try is a useless term / there is no distinct “try” that is neither do nor do not. One must do or do not; there is no try. Quod Erat Demonstrandum
minus-squaredream_weasel@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0·6 months agoThis is true only in hindsight though. You will always have done or not done even if you always set out to “do”. From this perspective it makes “don’t try” a little fatalistic, no?
minus-squareℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 months agoValid, but I do believe you’re overthinking a forced star wars pun…
There is no try, only do or do not!
All !do is do not (!do); all do is do. [law of non-contradiction]. All try = do or !do [succeeds or fails, proven by observation]
Therefore, no try != Not (do or !do)
Therefore try is a useless term / there is no distinct “try” that is neither do nor do not.
One must do or do not; there is no try.
Quod Erat Demonstrandum
This is true only in hindsight though. You will always have done or not done even if you always set out to “do”. From this perspective it makes “don’t try” a little fatalistic, no?
Valid, but I do believe you’re overthinking a forced star wars pun…