• unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    thats understandable but at least use something searchable that has tagging capabilities and is archivable so that you can come back to it years later

    • renzev@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      D*scord is technically searchable and fairly archiveable (messages never get deleted due to old age (in my experience at least) or if the original poster deletes their account). And some d*scord servers even have a Q&A mode similar to st*ck *verflow. But yeah, not the right tool for the job, not to mention ABSOLUTELY PROPRIETARY

        • renzev@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Same reasons you’d censor profanity. To show that I don’t necessarily agree with or support them. Maybe I should start using the vomit emoji instead of asterisks like u/pancakes [joking].

      • cheer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think what they really mean is searchable without an account, but otherwise you’re right.

          • vithigar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Or find lots of things that aren’t matches because it’s a fuzzy search with no way to search for exact text.

    • Zulip is a little better in this regard. I’m involved in Lean, which uses Zulip as the primary mode of support and documentation. While it’s usable, I still think that a Discourse style forum is the way to go.