dwazou@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-23 天前Paul McCartney and Dua Lipa urge UK Prime Minister to rethink his AI copyright plans. A new law could soon allow AI companies to use copyrighted material without permission. www.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square328fedilinkarrow-up1929arrow-down120
arrow-up1909arrow-down1external-linkPaul McCartney and Dua Lipa urge UK Prime Minister to rethink his AI copyright plans. A new law could soon allow AI companies to use copyrighted material without permission. www.theguardian.comdwazou@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-23 天前message-square328fedilink
minus-squarevrighter@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·2 天前well yeah. And it has been proven time and again that they can, and do, regurgitate that training material out quite often
minus-squareFiskFisk33@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-22 天前Yup. I don’t think training should be considered breaking copyright. Regurgitating though should. There are examples of use cases besides the right now obvious one of LLMs “creating” “original” content. One that comes to my mind is indexing books. Allowing for people to search for books based on a description.
well yeah. And it has been proven time and again that they can, and do, regurgitate that training material out quite often
Yup. I don’t think training should be considered breaking copyright. Regurgitating though should.
There are examples of use cases besides the right now obvious one of LLMs “creating” “original” content.
One that comes to my mind is indexing books. Allowing for people to search for books based on a description.