• isaacd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I think we all know where this is going.

    1. The Brainchip is trendy in Silicon Valley but doesn’t do much yet. The company says cyber-superintelligence will be available in a year, tops. Investors are pouring billions into it. Everyone says you need to hop on the trend now or you’ll be obsolete in six months.
    2. It’s been two years. The Brainchip still struggles to control a mouse or search Google. Everyone’s lost interest in building apps for it. Many users are reporting severe migraines, but the company says there’s nothing to worry about.
    3. The Brainchip pipes three unskippable ads directly to your optic nerve every time you go to the bathroom. Notifications ping your brain all day long. You can get it removed if you’ve got $80k to burn, but there’s a high risk of postoperative stroke.

    Yeah, no, I’m not putting anything in my brain that isn’t open-source from end to end. And even then probably nah.

    • bampop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Why so pessimistic? With any luck brainchips will mean the end of annoying adverts once and for all. You’ll just feel an unexpected desire to acquire certain products. And maybe crippling headaches or a nauseating feeling of unease if you ignore these urges

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      the only way, and I mean the ONLY way I’ll put hardware in my brain is if I have resurrection level support like in Altered Carbon.

      the fear of losing my outward identity over the ability to live forever is worth losing.

            • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              that’s where regulators step in, do you honestly believe elon musk would not be implanting healthy people with neuralinks if regulators would allow? They won’t, this is tech for people whose lives are so awful that not having one is worse than the things that may go wrong, for a very, very long time.

              • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                I didn’t think an old nazi with 32 felonies would be the leader of the free world, I’ve been surprised a few times in my life but nothing really does it anymore.

                Can you say your statement could hold up against 50 years of future trends? Transhumanism? Fanatics who want it so bad that they make it law?

                For that matter, who’s regulating Ai right now?