• LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    The DS had countless iterations and refreshes. The Switch was Nintendo’s flagship product. I also never said the steamdeck was useless or done. You know I didn’t, yet you pretend like I’m treating it as if its practically e-waste. I was very specific/nuanced in how I talked about it. I don’t know why this is such an important hill for you to die on but I think I’m being more than fair to the deck.

    If I didn’t think I could find good use for the steam deck for at least 5+ years then I wouldn’t have bought one. But like the Xbox Series S it is starting to show some age on more demanding titles. It is just reality, and for many people that’s not really a big deal. But for some it is.

    • Tony Bark@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      But like the Xbox Series S it is starting to show some age on more demanding titles.

      Sounds like this is more of the fault of the AAA publishers than the console makers.

          • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            Dude come on why are you making me be so prescriptive? Stop looking for holes and try to infer meaning/understand what I am actually saying. This isn’t a formal debate, you don’t need to score points. We are trying to reach mutual understanding.

            Yes it matters in the grand sense of things. I care about the state of the industry and gaming.

            It does not matter re: the subject I am talking about, i.e. whether or not the steamdeck is getting older/its AAA capabilities. I am talking about realties, you are trying to make this a discussion about values and developers. This is an assessment of the steamdeck as hardware.