I swear every single article critical of current LLMs is like, “The square got BLASTED by the triangle shape when it completely FAILED to go through the triangle shaped hole.”
It’s newsworthy when the sellers of squares are saying that nobody will ever need a triangle again, and the shape-sector of the stock market is hysterically pumping money into companies that make or use squares.
Well, the first and obvious thing to do to show that AI is bad is to show that AI is bad. If it provides that much of a low-hanging fruit for the demonstration… that just further emphasizes the point.
I swear every single article critical of current LLMs is like, “The square got BLASTED by the triangle shape when it completely FAILED to go through the triangle shaped hole.”
It’s newsworthy when the sellers of squares are saying that nobody will ever need a triangle again, and the shape-sector of the stock market is hysterically pumping money into companies that make or use squares.
It’s also from a company claiming they’re getting closer to create morphing shape that can match any hole.
And yet the company offers no explanation for how, exactly, they’re going to get wood to do that.
The press release where OpenAI said we’d never need chess players again
You get 2 triangles in a single square mate…
CHECKMATE!
Touchdown! 3 points!
Well, the first and obvious thing to do to show that AI is bad is to show that AI is bad. If it provides that much of a low-hanging fruit for the demonstration… that just further emphasizes the point.
That’s just clickbait in general these days lol