Chris Remington@beehaw.orgM to Technology@beehaw.org · 3 days agoYouTube relaxes moderation rules to allow more controversial contentwww.techspot.comexternal-linkmessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up164arrow-down10cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up164arrow-down1external-linkYouTube relaxes moderation rules to allow more controversial contentwww.techspot.comChris Remington@beehaw.orgM to Technology@beehaw.org · 3 days agomessage-square45fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squareBuelldozer@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·3 days ago Ah yes, the classic “lOOk aT tHE TOlEraNt LEfT” argument. The person I was replying too didn’t mention Left or Right and neither did I. It’s a false equivalency. Silencing your ideological opponents is ethically and morally inferior and I don’t care what your supposed motivation is.
minus-squareGanbat@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-23 days ago The person I was replying too didn’t mention Left or Right and neither did I. Question: are you really this dense, or just acting in bad faith? Silencing your ideological opponents is ethically and morally inferior and I don’t care what your supposed motivation is. “I want to eliminate all of insert racial or religious slur.” “That’s bad.” “I want to stop that person from saying and doing that.” "That’s exactly as bad.*
The person I was replying too didn’t mention Left or Right and neither did I.
Silencing your ideological opponents is ethically and morally inferior and I don’t care what your supposed motivation is.
Question: are you really this dense, or just acting in bad faith?
“I want to eliminate all of insert racial or religious slur.”
“That’s bad.”
“I want to stop that person from saying and doing that.”
"That’s exactly as bad.*