• VampirePenguin@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    13 hours ago

    It’s about resistance, not violence per we. Choosing the right kind of resistance for the situation is how change is made. Non violent protesting is for raising awareness and building solidarity. Violence is purely for defense and to show when a line has been crossed. Otherwise your movement will just become the next police state regime, if it doesn’t get crushed outright. People advocating for violence on social media are either bots or bad faith actors trying to stop the movement. Anyone seriously considering violence against the state sure as shit aren’t posting about it on Lemmy.

    • hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I’d say that being distruptive is what we should be discussing about. Strikes or boycotts, when organized well, can be examples of non-violent can actually work, while holding a sign in a park doesn’t do anything.

      • VampirePenguin@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Agree. But also, holding a sign in a park with 20 other people that you coordinated with is not nothing. It’s community building and solidarity, which are both essential.