hardypart@feddit.de to pics@lemmy.world · 3 years agoThe 11-mile long, 600 lbs IMAX print of ‘OPPENHEIMER’i.imgur.comimagemessage-square49linkfedilinkarrow-up118arrow-down12
arrow-up116arrow-down1imageThe 11-mile long, 600 lbs IMAX print of ‘OPPENHEIMER’i.imgur.comhardypart@feddit.de to pics@lemmy.world · 3 years agomessage-square49linkfedilink
minus-squarehungry_freaks_daddy@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·3 years agoYou are in fact wrong lol. Actual film has a resolution equivalent of something like 18K.
minus-squareMubelotix@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 years agoNot enough to justify using such a proprietary technology
minus-squareKbobabob@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 years ago proprietary technology Not like the off the shelf stuff you can get to store and show 18K.
minus-squareaverage650@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·3 years agoI don’t think there’s any reason we couldn’t make a store 18k video. And we could make screen at much higher resolutions that that at imax size, or even quite a bit smaller, though I suspect it would be absurdly expensive.
You are in fact wrong lol. Actual film has a resolution equivalent of something like 18K.
Not enough to justify using such a proprietary technology
Not like the off the shelf stuff you can get to store and show 18K.
I don’t think there’s any reason we couldn’t make a store 18k video.
And we could make screen at much higher resolutions that that at imax size, or even quite a bit smaller, though I suspect it would be absurdly expensive.