Jaden Norman@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agoAI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon studywww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square280fedilinkarrow-up1971arrow-down121cross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
arrow-up1950arrow-down1external-linkAI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon studywww.theregister.comJaden Norman@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square280fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
minus-squareTimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-24 months agoand? we can understand 256 where AI can’t, that’s the point.
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoThe 256 thing was written by a person. AI doesn’t have exclusive rights to being dumb, plenty of dumb people around.
minus-squareTimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoyou’re right, the dumb of AI is completely comparable to the dumb of human, there’s no difference worth talking about, sorry i even spoke the fuck up
Neither can we…
and? we can understand 256 where AI can’t, that’s the point.
The 256 thing was written by a person. AI doesn’t have exclusive rights to being dumb, plenty of dumb people around.
you’re right, the dumb of AI is completely comparable to the dumb of human, there’s no difference worth talking about, sorry i even spoke the fuck up
No worries.