…nothing lasts forever; especially not empires.

  • latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Agreed, that was the “advertised” goal, and the overall shape things took once it was set into motion. But looking at things now, in retrospect, I genuinely believe that’s just what everyone was told to sell them on the idea, with the actual plan being very different for those who had access backstage, y’know?

    I mean, it’s much easier to motivate people to uproot their lives (regardless of how abysmal their living conditions were at the time) by promising a Land of Opportunity For Everyone, instead of telling them “yeah, we’re a bunch of rich guys who want to get even richer, and we need cheap labour to get things started, then work for us, so that we may accumulate all of the wealth.”

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      My point is that, initially, labor-power wasn’t cheap. That’s why there were slaves and indentured servants, to make up for the fact that the commodity labor-power was pricier. That’s what’s so dangerous about settler-colonialism, it “works” for a far larger portion of society, which is why it has led to some of the most horrendous crimes of all time.

      It’s only now that the system is starting to genuinely unravel, but the US Empire’s history as one of the most far-right and brutal countries ever is directly tied to its large settler-colonial class relations.