• MysteriousSophon21@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      This is the biggest issue - peer review is supposed to be about critical analysis and domain expertise, not just following promts blindly, and no AI today has actual scientific understanding to catch subtle methodological flaws.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yeah absolutely, but researchers who are attempting skirt review processes to only receice positive feedback are not respecting the process.

      • CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        What’s to respect in an AI review where they didn’t even review the output. It’s an LLM lazy review. Deserves to be gamed.

        • Squizzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yes, the reviewers should not be using it. The researcher shouldnt be submitting it with the intention of gaming it.

          AI is not all LLM chat bots, there are legitimate AI implementations used in research.