fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Android@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 days agoGrapheneOS makers take a knife to this 'Google-free' phone coming to the US (Updated)www.androidauthority.comexternal-linkmessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up1152arrow-down115
arrow-up1137arrow-down1external-linkGrapheneOS makers take a knife to this 'Google-free' phone coming to the US (Updated)www.androidauthority.comfne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Android@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 days agomessage-square43fedilink
minus-squareIlandar@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days ago I mean the point was: “there is nothing actually wrong with Fairphone devices from a security perspective compared to the majority of its competitors” You really struggle with reading, don’t you? Who is doing strawmen now? 🤡 How in the world did you get to that idea from “together they could create a fantastic device”. “The increased userbase gives Graphene more leverage and in a just world big companies and countries would maybe rethink their approach to data collection.”
minus-squareIlandar@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days ago I responded to it Unfortunately you don’t seem to understand the meaning of the words “compared to”. If, as you admit: Slow security updates are a problem, plaguing basically all of Android. Then it is impossible for there to be something wrong with Fairphone security compared to the majority of competitors.
deleted by creator
You really struggle with reading, don’t you?
“The increased userbase gives Graphene more leverage and in a just world big companies and countries would maybe rethink their approach to data collection.”
deleted by creator
Unfortunately you don’t seem to understand the meaning of the words “compared to”. If, as you admit:
Then it is impossible for there to be something wrong with Fairphone security compared to the majority of competitors.