idk the author

  • sunbytes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Doesn’t fascism require a strong man leader?

    I’m all for calling out destructive ideologies but if we call everything fascism then it’s really going to dilute the power of the term.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      I’m far, far more concerned with the regular fascism going on then someone crashing out about why people wont just stop being terrible to each other.

    • stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Fascists typically believe in strongman leadership, but you don’t have to swear allegiance to a specific strongman to be a fascist.

      Eco-fascists, in particular, want a Pol Pot-style dictator, someone who will ignore laws, human rights, and common decency, in order to drastically reduce the human population and force the survivors into low-tech subsistence farming. Last I checked, no one like that is anywhere near power anywhere in the world, but that doesn’t make eco-fascists any less fascist for it.

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I think eco-fascism in particular is fascinating, because elements of it can take root in otherwise very progressive individuals. And then they go on to spread to crypto-fascism without even knowing it–like the “humans are the virus” thing, which you might chalk up to everyday cynicism.

        I mean this is true of all fascisms. I hesitate to call it a natural human disease of the mind or anything like that, but it certainly is a tendency, especially when times are tough.