A US tech company says its chief executive has quit after he was apparently caught on a big screen at a Coldplay concert embracing a female co-worker, in a clip that went viral.

The clip showed a man and a woman hugging on a jumbo screen at the arena in Foxborough, Massachusetts, before they abruptly ducked and hid from the camera.

The pair were identified in US media as Mr Byron, a married chief executive of Astronomer, and Kristin Cabot, the firm’s chief people officer.

  • FelixCress@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    38
    ·
    3 days ago

    Also, most companies have a written policy about fraternizing with subordinates. It usually states termination as a consequence of breaking the policy.

    This is completely fucking moronic. Employees are not a company property. Good there is the article 8 (right to private life) of Humans Rights Act in the UK, stopping madness like this.

    • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I am from the UK and this wouldn’t fly here either.

      You can’t be sleeping with your employees dude that’s a clear power imbalance dynamic and you would be fired here too for having a relationship with a subordinate.

      It’s not like companies give a shit who you sleeping with but they have rules in place to prevent abuses of power and also to protect their own image.

      Seems pretty naive that you can only see this from a very limited angle.

      • FelixCress@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        You can be sleeping with your employees dude that’s a clear power imbalance dynamic and you would be fired here too for having a relationship with a subordinate.

        Educate yourself.

        https://www.employmentlawreview.co.uk/personal-relationships-at-work-what-does-uk-law-say/

        You can be forced to disclose relationships and sacked if you fail to do so. You cannot be sacked for having a relationship.

        Completely banning personal relationships at work would likely breach an employee’s right to a private life. However, that doesn’t mean employers can’t put measures in place to mitigate risks to the business caused by such relationships. Policies employers may want to consider implementing include:

        Ensuring that employees disclose any workplace relationships they have so that appropriate steps can be taken to minimise risks

        Restricting employees who deal with recruitment from the process if it involves someone they have a personal relationship with

        Potentially changing an employee’s manager if they’re in a relationship with their current one, providing this doesn’t discriminate against them

        • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Note in your first paragraph of the quote, it only says likely. So even they admit that there is wiggle room. Nothing in the article specifically protected the right to have a relationship with a subordinate, and in fact says if disclosed they can move people so they are no long subordinate as a result of thier relationship. Which is clearly not saying that company policy can’t involve consequences for having a relationship with a subordinate.

          The CEO wasn’t transparent about it to the board, so he can be fired for that.

          He was married, so he would be breaking a law by having sex with anyone else in many jurisdictions, and the bad image/press that gives the company would be enough to fire him even if it wasn’t illegal where he is.

          The liability alone that she “could” claim she felt pressured into the relationship because he was the boss would likely give them cause to fire him based on his contract.

            • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adultery_laws “There are fifteen[6] countries in which stoning is authorized as lawful punishment” (for adultery)

              Plenty more it is just illegal.

              16 us states.

              Punishment and enforcement vary. But it is certainly against the law in a lot of places. In others it will put you “at fault” in divorce proceedings. So maybe not illegal, but has legal consequences.

    • 3abas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Are you seriously suggesting is perfectly normal in the UK for the CEO to have an affair with the head of HR that he hired, and no one would complain because of human rights act?

      • overthere@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        The Europeans had, and still have in some cases, dynastic royalty and state religions and stuff. They’re surprisingly backward in a lot of ways. The personal freedom to use your power imbalance at work for sexual gratification seems like the sort of thing they’d never move forward away from.

        • 3abas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Look, I come from the middle east where my entire life way ruled over by monarchs installed by England and currently controlled by America… They are literally untouchable, more so than ornamental monarchs like Europe. And if a big shot company owner is caught having an affair, they could literally both be killed by their respective families… I don’t think European CEOs can get away with it because they have royalty.

          • overthere@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Royalty (even ornamental) in the 21st century is just an example of having backwards and ridiculously outmoded cultural constructs. I admit that I could have phrased that better.

            European résumés include photographs and marital status, which would be an outrageous reach into one’s personal life in the states. It’s not surprising that they’re ok with the idea that bosses should be able to have relationships with their employees and still keep their jobs. I guess that makes the resumes make more sense.

      • FelixCress@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        It is perfectly normal to not have your personal life controlled by a company, yes.

        Blows USians mind, eh?

        • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          You’re not understanding the full context of this situation. And then acting like everyone else here are the dumb ones.

          You should just stop embarrassing yourself.

        • 3abas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I’m not a USian, I just have critical thinking skills.

          It’s called conflict of interest, and disclosure is often required to avoid accusations of favoritism.

          • FelixCress@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            Disclosure - yes. That can be requested and an employee may be sacked if he fails to disclose such information. Unlike USA however, companies are unable to tell an employee to NOT have a relationship with someone at work. It can make a decision to move employees in relationship to other teams if for example there is a risk involved.

            • 3abas@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              That can be requested and an employee may be sacked if he fails to disclose such information

              That’s what happened here… He didn’t disclose the relationship because it was an affair.

              Unlike USA however, companies are unable to tell an employee to NOT have a relationship with someone at work.

              It isn’t real just because you imagine it… That’s not how it works in the US.

    • mriswith@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Once again, America shows how “free” they actually are.

      And to show that the protection is not theoretical in Europe: Walmart implemented that policy when they tried getting into the German market twenty years ago. They were so insistent that it took a judge to tell them to stop it since it was against the law(It’s sraight up against the first and second article of the German constitution, which protects personal freedom).

      • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        They were free to disclose it. It is this way because people have used interoffice relationships to better their positions and create favor, which leads to an imbalanced an unfair workplace. Having a secret romance in the office has the potential for failure at best.

        • mriswith@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          If you do a “germany walmart before:2023” search, you’ll find a bunch of English articles about the whole ordeal. It was in Forbes, NYT, etc. almsot twenty years ago because of how badly they failed on multiple levels.

        • andrewta@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          So what happens when a CEO uses his position of power to force somebody into a relationship how does she prove that it was not consensual? These rules are in place to make sure the underlings are protected.

          If she gets promoted because she had sex with the boss, you’re telling me that won’t create a hostile work environment for the rest of the people that work there? If they are passed over for a promotion?

          If she gets promotion, even if it was a earned promotion, you’re telling me the rest of the office won’t question it if she gets that promotion because of a belief that she got it because she slept with the boss?

          There’s a lot that the US gets wrong. This is one item we got right. Yes, they are free to sleep with whoever they want, but they have to disclose it to the company. And there cannot be a boss underling type relationship if they are sleeping with each other.

          But this has been explained to you by other people and you just are basically ignoring what others are saying.