• meyotch@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yes.

    Would one question the relevance of a biography that mentioned that an accomplished straight male scientist was a ‘family man’ or that a scientist was also a married woman with children?

    Questioning the validity of mentioning that a scientist is queer is identical to the attitude that queer people are fine as long as they are invisible.

    It was a biography, biographies mention biographical details. Yet when that detail is ‘queer’, people feel empowered to complain it was even mentioned.

    I’m not on the defensive here. I intend to come across as offensive. You tell US exactly why mentioning that a person is queer is not relevant in a biographical sketch.

    • individual@toast.ooo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      22 hours ago

      OK so where is the representation of people with arthritis, Zoroastrians, & people from Bangladesh?

      • meyotch@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Ok, you are a sealion, cool, good to know.

        Did you know you can mention multiple facts about a person in a biography and they are all valid and mentionable?

          • meyotch@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            I know that my engagement in this exercise will not change their opinion. I am engaged because this shit is exhausting and it is exactly the thing to challenge at this moment.

            I think it’s time to start wearing these, before they become mandatory again.

            pink triangles