• patatas@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Sounds like you’d agree that the Canadian reporters who happen to work for US-owned outlets like the Ottawa Citizen are also doing their best to tell the truth. Totally reasonable argument

    • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I would hope so.

      Here’s a semi-related tip I learned that I use religiously:

      Journalists are not supposed to be leading you to an opinion, so I look at if they’re using qualitative words instead of quantitative

      Ex; “The car drove fast.” is leading you to an opinion. They should tell you a speed in number format so you can decide if that’s too fast for yourself.

      • patatas@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Well, hopefully you can continue to provide this type of analysis when others in this community cast doubt on high-quality reporting merely because of the nationality of an outlet’s ownership.

        • LostWon@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          While I recall seeing some columnists who seem to have a specific agenda to back certain industries, I think what most people are concerned about is not that breaking reports are done by cartoonishly evil journalists, but that foreign interests have undue influence over editorial decisions. (As I see it, billionaires from our own country are equally as bad and media concentration in general should also be addressed, but it makes sense to have reasonable restrictions on foreign-ownership of media.)

          • patatas@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I absolutely agree with everything you just said.

            And yet when our PM threatens to slash the CBC’s budget by $198m, the same folks hammering those points fail to point out the exact same issue of undue pressure and influence. Why?