The homeowner told police the two men said they were police and claimed they were at the home to serve a warrant.

[The homeowner] became suspicious, because, you know, they have a ring camera too, and the suspects were saying they had a warrant, but it was just two people and they’re masked up and no police cars, no lights or anything like that," said Lt. Khan with HPD.

At some point, police said the men shot at the homeowner through the door, prompting the homeowner to return fire.

The homeowner was not hurt in the gunfire, but the two men were both hit and pronounced dead at the scene.

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    They had been burglarizing the neighbor’s empty house and were leaving.

    That isn’t worth killing over.

    • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think it is worth killing. The world is a slightly better place for every such person who gets killed.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Stuff is never more valuable than human life, and you have no idea what material conditions led to this behavior.

        • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          There is no material conditions that justify violating families safety and property by invading their homes. Doing is evil and it puts not only yourself but them at risk. You never know if you are going to run into a kid or grandma alone at home after the family car(s) have left. Any adults who do this once will do it again and probably again and again. Eliminating them now makes countless families safer.

          It’s not just about the stuff.

        • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          In a vacuum that is correct. But material conditions must never lead to random act of violence for selfish gains, it frays the threads of society and leads to a worse outcome for everyone. If you are hungry, go steal from walmart, go rob a bank, don’t break into someone’s home, you don’t know (and obviously don’t care) about the circumstances of your victim, so why should a society extend you the same courtesy?