• QuadDamage@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    8 days ago

    Very nice to see, only worry is that Linux will get enshittified (primarily by the GNOME people).

    • whosepoopisonmybutt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      8 days ago

      Is it even possible for Linux to get enshitified? Wouldn’t the open source community just go back and fork from before the enshitification began? Surely, enshitified versions could be made but people would simply not use them unless there was some proprietary component they wanted.

      • traceur201@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 days ago

        If there were a single corporate controlled entry point all these people were funneling into there would be posential for enshittification. Even if a single free vertically integrated project like debian suddenly had the majority of all PC users it would probably be impossible for them to avoid the corruption of money. But the linux ecosystem appears to currently be growing in a manner that preserves its diversity and organic nature and thus seems able to remain quite healthy in doing so

      • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 days ago

        Embrace, extend, extinguish.

        I would be incredibly weary if someone like Meta, Google, or Microsoft started their own distro. Make a solid distro with lots of bells and whistles few distros have, pre-install it on the hottest gear, poach the best devs away from open-source projects, exert more and more influence over kernel development, wait for a majority to get locked in and then start making parts of the OS proprietary so open-source can’t keep up, and the dominoes fall from there.

      • QuadDamage@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Obviously not blatant money/data harvesting like with big tech companies, but corporate strong-arming has been done on Linux (systemD) and can be done again. Granted it’s much harder on Linux (in the case of my SystemD example there are distros like Void or Artix) but there is still a risk imo.

    • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 days ago

      The gnome people have no profit motive to encourage enshittification.

      Gnome 3 was sluggish when it came out, but it’s perfectly fine nowadays. Just avoid it if you don’t like the workflow.

    • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      If only your distro would support more than one desktop.

      I will say though, Gnome dropping support for other window managers does suck. That is them removing infrastructure that non-(or semi) Gnome users depend on.

    • Ŝan@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      Very nice to see, only worry is that Linux will get enshittified (primarily by the GNOME people).

      You misspelled “systemd”.