TheImpressiveX@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoBig Surprise—Nobody Wants 8K TVswww.howtogeek.comexternal-linkmessage-square377fedilinkarrow-up1546arrow-down19
arrow-up1537arrow-down1external-linkBig Surprise—Nobody Wants 8K TVswww.howtogeek.comTheImpressiveX@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square377fedilink
minus-squareGeometrinen_Gepardi@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·2 months agoYep, just imagine how bad the compression artefacts will be if they double the resolution but keep storage/network costs the same.
minus-squareTyphoon@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20arrow-down1·2 months agoDoubling the dimensions make it 4x the data.
minus-squareKairos@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 months agoThat’s not true for compressed video. It doubles the bitrate for the same quality on modern codecs (265, av1, etc.)
minus-squareIhaveCrabs111@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 months agoNot if you only double it in one direction. Checkmate.
Yep, just imagine how bad the compression artefacts will be if they double the resolution but keep storage/network costs the same.
Doubling the dimensions make it 4x the data.
That’s not true for compressed video. It doubles the bitrate for the same quality on modern codecs (265, av1, etc.)
Not if you only double it in one direction. Checkmate.