Might be easier to just limit the caffeine max per can.
I feel like teenagers will drink X cans per night regardless, so its easier harm reduction to reduce the caffer per drink then try to remove the drinls from teens all together.
That’s not true. Imagine a hypothetical scenario where the government awarded an extra dollar in tax benefits to any company that was able to keep caffeine within a certain range. You can literally guarantee every drink manufacturer would refactor their operations overnight.
This is not a “can’t be done” scenario, this is we don’t want to because we’re profiting from it scenario.
Might be easier to just limit the caffeine max per can.
I feel like teenagers will drink X cans per night regardless, so its easier harm reduction to reduce the caffer per drink then try to remove the drinls from teens all together.
That’s not true. Imagine a hypothetical scenario where the government awarded an extra dollar in tax benefits to any company that was able to keep caffeine within a certain range. You can literally guarantee every drink manufacturer would refactor their operations overnight.
This is not a “can’t be done” scenario, this is we don’t want to because we’re profiting from it scenario.
You’re just offering a different way to reduce caffine per drink, no?
They are, but they want a neoliberal solution that directs public money to companies instead of food regulators.