• Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      They look like every other SUV on the market. These things are designed by committee and focus groups.

  • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Ill just stay with the classics. No goofy cheeks, mustache, teeth, etc. Theres that argument that older cars are less safe but older cars didnt weigh as much as a cargo ship and you could still improve their safety design with a few tweeks. Literally everyone wants reworked classics, why dont car companies just make those?

    • iii@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It’s an oligarchy, so they just made what was easiest for them.

      Now that there’s asian cars that are more popular and cheaper they go cry baby poor us give us subsidies.

  • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    The merc would look okay with a black grille. Not stunning, but okay. I do like the mini merc logos in the lights.

    The BMW just needs to start over.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m sorry Europeans, but sitting on your vast catalog of drop dead gorgeous classic cars is a crime.

    I mean, people remake them and sell them for a fortune why can’t they just massage the old bodies and put them over there.

    • alterforlett @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Honest answer, it’s health and safety. Old designs aren’t necessarily pedestrian impact friendly, and some don’t leave a lot of options for crumple zones.

      Being a car designer now, with all the limitations must be challenging/frustrating/suck

      Edit: that’s no excuse for the basking shark looking Merc and the ridiculous attempt at two front teeth on the BMW

      • iii@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Ez: just mandate that pedestrians have crumple zones instead of cars

      • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Old designs aren’t necessarily pedestrian impact friendly, and some don’t leave a lot of options for crumple zones.

        Depends. 30 year old designs are probably more pedestrian-friendly than SUVs. The shapes were certainly better for that, and I assume they already invented crumple zones in 1995.

          • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            24 hours ago

            Renault 4 and 5

            Those look good!

            It’d be awesome if they make a Renault 5 rally-inspired version, with a little more suspension travel.

            Peugot should be next with the 205:

            img

            It’s like a perfect mix of small, practical, understated, until you squint and realize it’s fast too.

            • AMoralNihilist@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              16 hours ago

              They did make a rally inspired version! Although I think it’s more racey than longer suspension.

              That Peugeot would be brilliant. I want more hot hatch electric cars. Instead of all these fucking SUV mimics.

              • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                9 hours ago

                I see it! It’s low volume it seems, but still cool.

                I wish Ford could get back in, if it weren’t for the tariffs and all. I know they made some noise about and Escort tribute, but they mind as well go full crazy and make a high volume RS200-looking EV:

                img

                Stubby, almost no space wasted over the front axel, but they could make it a proper hatchback without the engine bay. It’s perfect!

      • WILSOOON@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Nope its not health and safety, a lot of old cars can be refitted for roll cages and most of them are way lighter than current cars, thus making them need less large crumple zones.

        Its not a supply problem since almost every car maker on the planet still has a supply chain for old parts. and since modern manufacturing is so adaptable the cost of retooling the factories is pretty much negligible in the grand scheme of things.

        Its not a demand problem bc every fucking person on the planet would buy an old bmw or mercedes over this minimalist slop. Hell old audis or 70’s renaults look sexy as hell.

        No its a damn mentality problem. They dont want to make old cars since it would be admitting that modern cars are designed like a tweaker on caffeine spat all over the design board. It would be admitting that car design has declined over the past 45 years. It would be admitting that the top brass at these companies are a bunch of useless limp dick baboons who’s biggest contributions to the company are limiting themselves one line of crack a day.

        Thats the reason why, that there is no good reason why not.

        • BootLoop@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I hate new design trends and overweight cars as much as anybody else, but roll cages make a vehicle less safe unless paired with a helmet, neck restraint, and a harness.

  • Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    You know they do this on purpose, and you just showed exactly why it works. They make the design controversial so people talk and argue about it. They thank you for the free advertising.