• Lembot_0004@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    “Ethically, we can’t ask people to drink alcohol to levels they do in their day-to-day lives,” says Jeff Boissoneault

    That’s why ethics in science should only limit activities that cause the death and intense suffering of humans. We will die if our scientists are stopped because of such pathetic reasons as “we can’t ask people to drink alcohol to levels they like”.

    • squaresinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Isn’t that exactly what these scientists are doing?

      4.7% of all deaths are attributed to alcohol consumption and a lot more people are suffering intensly due to alcohol consumption.

      How many people would have to die for you to consider it unethical?

      • tmyakal@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Absolutely this. The American Cancer Association advises it is best not to drink alcohol. Alcohol use accounts for 5% of all cancers in the US.

        So it’s a known carcinogen that also impairs judgements and motor functions, causes brain damage, and is habit forming. Just because it’s been socialized to be acceptable doesn’t mean it’s not deadly.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Given that many people partake anyway, Maybe we should have some scientists study their behavior and the ramifications of their choices.

            • AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              24 minutes ago

              Yes, the circle is my point. You can’t argue that it’s always bad for people’s health so you can’t study it. Being known bad for people’s health just makes it more important to find a way

              • squaresinger@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 minutes ago

                Did you read the article? Do you even know what we are talking about?

                The article specifically says how they managed to study drunk people without telling them to drink, and it’s surprisingly easy: wait for people to get drunk on their own and then study the effects.

                Kinda surprised that I have to spell that out for you.

                • AA5B@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 minutes ago

                  Almost like I brought it around full circle , after posts questioning the ethics of studying it