• Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    but I don’t see Uber being at any sort of fault here unless their policy is no animals

    If it is about a neccessary service dog, then it’s not up to them (or their policy) to decide. At least, it shouldn’t be.

      • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        16 hours ago

        No, it isn’t. The ADA is very clear in this.

        Oh, and once you start using your vehicle for business purposes, especially transporting people for money, it’s no longer a “personal vehicle”.

      • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        16 hours ago

        But it’s up to the driver whether to allow

        No. Doing public transport as a business means, it is public now and it must not be up to the driver’s mood anymore (within reasonable boundaries that should be defined by some law).