Should OS makers, like Microsoft, be legally required to provide 15 years of security updates?

  • bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    15 years is actually reasonable.

    I have a ten year old laptop with an i7 processor, 16 GB RAM, and 1 TB SSD. It still does most things, I bought it for initially just fine. Granted this was one of the best laptops you could buy at the time.

    Apple stopped supporting it with a current version of macOS a couple of years ago sadly. It’s still possible to patch newer versions to install and run on the old machine, but it’s a bit of a hassle.

    • pirat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Are we talking OpenCore Patcher? I was actually planning on trying that for my Early 2013 MBP, but I’m leaning more towards some Linux distro now, for the longevity of it, though I haven’t yet figured out which distro supports my MBP the best. Got any recommendations to share on some of this?

    • phillipp@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      But unlike server aided services an OS still keeps working. You can use that PC for 10 more years, if you like.

      I think there’s a discrepancy in the understanding of ‘support’ and what it entails in different technology fields. Demanding to receive NEW features for decades is not feasible in the current economic environment.

      • bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        The biggest issue is security updates and a current internet browser.

        Of course I can use a 30 year old computer that still works with the software it can run.