• eldebryn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah great. Capitalist market without socialist values means the elite can overcome their handicaps and live long lives with a physical form sculpted to their wants.

      Call me when it’s done without a metric tonne of exploitation.

      • FishFace@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        This comment seems to lack perspective. In countries where medicine is socialised, this technology wasn’t invented. Could it have been? Yes, absolutely. But in the reality we are faced with, it was invented with capitalist values. Now it can be assessed and potentially taken up by public health systems.

        • eldebryn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          I’m not saying that technology and progress is bad nor that we should stop pursuing it.

          I’m saying that progress that only benefits 1% or less of the people doesn’t interest me.

          If your innovation cannot reasonably exist without economic bubbles and worker exploitation, then it doesn’t deserve to.

          Even if we found the cure to cancer tomorrow but it was so expensive and restricted that maybe 1000 billionaires alone could afford it I literally wouldn’t care for it.

          The cost for achieving all that is exploitation. It literally worsens the lives of many, so that few can taste the fruits of advancement. I’d rather we discovered that cure 20 years later if it meant that 99% of us had better quality of life.

          The rich want the opposite and try convince you and me and everyone else that this is to the benefit of humankind because advancement happen faster with capitalism.

          I have no sources on that. But even if they do, I simply don’t care about it. It doesn’t benefit me nor anyone I know.

          • FishFace@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Yeah I am also not particularly interested by healthcare which only benefits a tiny fraction of society.

            However, when glasses were first invented they were only accessible to very few people. Technology tends to get more accessible over time as it is developed from a niche product to something for the mass market. So we can be cautious about the impact of these smart glasses, but still recognise that, for something that costs significantly less than a hearing aid and has hearing-aid like features, making life easier for people with hearing and vision impairments is in fact a key area where tech can help, is helping, and is recognised as such even in the world of big tech.

      • Aneb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’ll give you an upvote. I feel thats fair. Like you guys if you can’t make buck you lose a buck. (Any of you read Uglies?) We really need a reset on the capitalist regime imo and instate a socialist platform that is by the people and for the people. Fuck with this AI nonsense too

        • eldebryn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s really bad yes. I’m no communist but I really think we should have had mixed economies and better tax policies to keep the rich in check. AI and other automation could have led to us working 20hrs a week on average while everything runs smooth, if used for the benefit of all.

          Right now they have snowballed so much money and power and tech that I just can’t see how we can out of outside of revolts. Democracy has been corrupted almost everywhere and people are being manipulated into thinking other religions or immigrant are the problem.

          There was a time we banned cloning to prevent the rich from making armies to exploit. But religion/ethics made that easy. We never considered doing the same with tech and important means of production.