• RustyNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      Oh no need. The client didn’t noticed anything in 6 years, and the reason why we had to check is because they wanted us to see if we could add this feature… That already existed.

      • Elvith Ma'for@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        My favorite part is, if you do some extensive analytics from time to time (e.g. to prepare an upgrade to a new major version) and as a side effect stumble upon some workflows/pipelines/scripts constantly failing (and alerting the process owner) every five minutes for… at least a few months already.

        Then you go and ask the process owner and they’re just like “yeah, we were annoyed by the constant error notification mails, so we mad a filter that auto deletes them”…

        • greybeard@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I feel like half my job is trying to stop false positives and other noise from hitting important places. Because false positives kill any chance true positives will be noticed/reacted to/processed.