Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 15 hours agoIt's that time againlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square96fedilinkarrow-up1615arrow-down112file-text
arrow-up1603arrow-down1imageIt's that time againlemmy.dbzer0.comAtherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 15 hours agomessage-square96fedilinkfile-text
Cross-posted from “It’s that time again” by @Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com in !linux_memes@programming.dev
minus-squareoverload@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down4·14 hours agoGood for you. I broke my GNOME Pop OS build, I assume because of extensions and pop not updating anything for 2 years. GNOME goes against the Linux philosophy of user customisation.
minus-squarePetter1@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down3·14 hours agoThey don’t develop GNOME for you, they develop GNOME for them They don’t earn more with more users
minus-squareZangoose@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down3·14 hours agoIf it’s only for them then they shouldn’t mind getting their Wayland protocol veto privilege taken away 🤷
minus-squarePetter1@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 hours agoYea I agree, that seems fair 🤔 but it is for wayland to decide l, I guess
Good for you. I broke my GNOME Pop OS build, I assume because of extensions and pop not updating anything for 2 years. GNOME goes against the Linux philosophy of user customisation.
They don’t develop GNOME for you, they develop GNOME for them
They don’t earn more with more users
If it’s only for them then they shouldn’t mind getting their Wayland protocol veto privilege taken away 🤷
Yea I agree, that seems fair 🤔 but it is for wayland to decide l, I guess