• Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    There are so many things the Linux kernel project does just right. One of them is “never break user space”.
    Unfortunately most projects completely fail to get why this is important.
    I think one of the worst examples is the enormous setback it caused when Python was “upgraded” from 2 to 3, which meant breakage of huge amounts of libraries, that were never fixed, and was extremely detrimental to Python.

    The kernel respects user-space, but actual user front ends do not!?!?!
    KDE generally does the same when they upgrade to new versions of QT.

        • cole@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          staying on an end of life unsupported programming language does not spark joy.

          open source projects are (often) maintained by unpaid volunteers. unpaid volunteers doing something for the passion of it often don’t want to build with one hand tied behind their back

    • jbk@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      21 hours ago

      The kernel equivalent of shell extensions would be kernel modules. Out of tree modules break all the time. There’s no stable in-kernel ABI, just like there’s no guarantee that shell internals never change.