• Victor Villas@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    so I certainly hope someone is taking serum samples so we can at least research what immunity they gained to save other avians from flu outbreaks in the future. They may be worth more alive to science now

    There’s no shortage of means to reproduce what happened to these birds in a lab, with much more reliable controls. These birds are worth nothing to science now

    • Arghblarg@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Aren’t these birds safe now, since they have recovered from the flu? I mean, we don’t quarantine people permanently after they recover from the flu because they’re not infectious anymore. Insisting they still be culled at this point serves only to set an example that no one should try to skirt health laws simply by delaying (which may have some merit, but seems cruel to me). Still. I don’t dispute that they should have been culled originally but the infectious window’s “ship has sailed”, has it not? So it seems a bit pointless to do now unless they actually still present a threat. If the farm owners delayed the culling by impeding it then penalize them, certainly with fines or jail time. But the animals don’t need to suffer at this point do they?

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        30 days ago

        They can still get sick or be carriers and spread it to the native birds. The farmers are taking no precautions.

      • Pyr@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        30 days ago

        Avian flu doesn’t have 100% mortality, birds survive it all the time these ostriches aren’t that special medically or scientifically, just lucky.

        We don’t quarantine people forever because they are people, not animals.

        There is also president to set, because if they get an exception every farm down the road will ignore avian flu outbreaks because it might mean 40% of their flock can survive instead of all of the flock being killed and then tie up the courts forever fighting dozens of farms in court instead of just one.

      • Victor Villas@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        (sorry for the late reply)

        Aren’t these birds safe now, since they have recovered from the flu?

        No

        we don’t quarantine people permanently after they recover from the flu

        Correct, and we also don’t have cull orders for humans.

        Insisting they still be culled at this point serves only to set an example

        Incorrect. This flock is compromised and is putting humans and other birds at risk

        the infectious window’s “ship has sailed”, has it not?

        No

        But the animals don’t need to suffer at this point do they?

        Right, they don’t need to suffer. They need to be either absolutely quarantined or destroyed. The owners are making zero effort to quarantine the birds, so it’s on them that the only option is culling.

        • Arghblarg@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          I don’t claim to be a veterinarian, doctor or flu expert, so if what you say is true and they are still a risk to spread avian flu to other animals then I agree, sadly they need to be culled. I was under the impression that the virus would have burned itself out among the flock if it were isolated all this time. But if they weren’t being isolated all this time then that’s not a valid premise.

          • Victor Villas@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            The fact that the farmers are still making zero effort to isolate these animals from humans and wildlife is the main reason the animals need to be culled as soon as possible