Sorry if this is not the place for that kind of discussion. I would like to be civil, please. Some people on Reddit were talking about how only dictators would want to disarm people.

Can I have some explanation on your opinion and why? I believe weapons should be banned and that crime should not exist in the first place. My opinion may change, but I believe there should somehow be strict rules regarding crime to reduce the amount of it and just have a place where it will not be worried about.

  • juliebean@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    a legal monopoly on violence is the cornerstone of the states power. while there are definitely valid reasons to want to restrict access to the tools of violence, the state will always have that access, and if it restricts the general populations access to same, it becomes far easier to oppress them.

    also, if we’re gonna ban weapons, i’d like to start with SUVs.

    • jlow (he / him)@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think only the state having weapons is the less terrible option instead of everybody having weapons.

      But +1 to banning SUVs (and cars in general).

      • MotoAsh@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        You’re going to need A LOT more public transit already in place before banning cars would ever be a remotely ‘good’ idea.