• ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Communists are liberals, it’s funny seeing how many liberals in the fediverse use it as a slur. Even the anarchists look down on the anti-government people.

    And yeah Libertarians are liberal as well, the problem is including everyone else that isn’t authoritarian.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        48 minutes ago

        See you don’t know what the term liberal means.

        It has nothing to do with capitalism.

        Communism doesn’t have a government, that makes them liberals.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          47 minutes ago

          Liberalism is an ideology supporting private property and individualism. Communism doesn’t have a state, but it does have administration, which some consider government, and communism lacks private property.

          • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            41 minutes ago

            If you have an administration then you create a class struggle that will lead to oppression.

            You have private property because the state (public) doesn’t own it, the people do. (That’s private since you seem confused)

              • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                23 minutes ago

                Can the administration control what the commune does? Laws? Policing?

                If so then given time the people who seek it will elevate that position.

                Public ownership under communism doesn’t mean the government (or administration to use your term without a difference) owns it. It means the population has control over whether it is helping (keep) or hurting (remove) society. And the workers are at the forefront of that not politicians or owners.

                You’re aware that liberalism views landowners as a scourge of society because they make money without adding anything to the world but you cannot view said viewpoint from a communist perspective.

                I’ll give you another crazy idea; political parties/governments are corporations. They will put their own survival above that of the people they represent.

    • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Why do you feel confident to speak on a subject you have clearly spent zero time informing yourself?

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        35 minutes ago

        Communists aren’t authoritarian and the concept predates communism. (Communism is a reaction against oppression so arguing criticism against oppression is anti-communist doesn’t make sense)

    • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Ngl I don’t blame anarchists. Public schools explicitly said “communism is when government doess stuff.”