On Thursday afternoon, prosecutors in Texas announced that terrorism charges had been filed against two people for alleged involvement in a shooting during a July 4 protest against the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Prairieland Detention Center in Alvarado, Texas, in which a local police officer was injured.

This is the first time federal terrorism charges have been deployed in association with the “antifa” label, just a month after President Donald Trump announced that he was designating antifa a “major terrorist organization” — a designation that does not exist under law for domestic groups.

The Prairieland case is setting a chilling example for how the government will use so-called counterterrorism efforts to crush anti-fascist dissent. Neither of the people named in the indictment are accused of shooting the gun. Instead, Zachary Evetts and Autumn Hill are accused of “providing material support to terrorists” and having “aided and abetted” the alleged attempted murder of government officers.

The federal indictment accuses Hill, who prosecutors dead-named, and Evetts as being part of an “antifa cell.”

The terrorism charges are an escalation of government efforts to criminalize protest movements by attempting to attribute collective guilt.

  • zululove@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    There is no point in individual resistance of this sort. You will only go to jail. If you are truly a revolutionary fighter who is ready to do stuff like this well gtfo offline first, & get organized with a lot of ppl.

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    if constitution doesnt protect them, that means the whole thing is just piece of paper and effectively null under america’s current government.

  • carlossurf@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Step one of fascist government label anyone that doesnt agree with them as antifa

    • Lka1988@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Well, I mean, are they not?

      The real problem is the people in charge taking a common abbreviation of an arguably positive ideology, twisting that abbreviation into a “scary” name, calling it a violent group, packaging it all up with a neat little bow, and then parroting it to the brainwashed masses.

    • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Agreed.

      And, it’s a bit uncanny how eerily close this is to that of the far left when they accuse anyone that’s a hair’s width right of the bat-shit insanity of Stalin of being in support of genocide.

      They have distanced themselves so far from an alt-right ideology- that they have circled all the way back around to being comparatively identical in their absence of logic.

      EDIT: take note how well my point was made in the responses I’ve received. I’ve been accused of both being “programmed” and being a member of truth social- just for points out the fact that there are people who will immediately accuse you of being something you’re not- just because you disagree with them.

      (For the record: this was purposefully done to net these results. Some people are so predictable, you can essentially get them to prove your point for you).

  • manxu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    First they claimed everything good is Socialism, and now there is a whole generation that thinks Socialism is good.

    Now they are taking any opposition and call it terrorism, what do they think is going to happen when more and more people start opposing their living conditions?

  • ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    btw, attacking them isn’t terrorism… at worst you could say treason? (although the people being attacked were actually treasonous).
    terrorism would be attacking civilians randomly… like, say blowing up boats full of people who aren’t waging war…