• yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    Sales tax on the tickets alone more than makes up for the value of the item itself though. 8.7 million visitors a year results in a shitton of tax money which benefits the people of France.

    • venusaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Totally, but people would still line up to see Mona Lisa. Not saying to get rid of the museum.

      • favoredponcho@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        If the Mona Lisa were stolen; you’d have been arguing that that should’ve been sold off as well. These jewels are also historical artwork and have a rich history behind them that can never be recovered.

      • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Sure, though it could be less people for the same ticket price.

        If we look at the extreme case, removing every item from the Louvre but the Mona Lisa would result in significantly less tax income because there’s no way millions would spend [insert Louvre ticket price I am too lazy to research]€ for looking at a single painting for 5 minutes.

        Museums with more items generally result in more money.