• LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Improved human health and well-being in cities certainly couldn’t hurt. But it’s not really meant to be part of that strategy. It’s more to prevent human suffering and death from disease.

      • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        human suffering

        Right, so we should also eradicate all human predators to prevent human suffering at all, yeah?

        death from disease

        Malaria (and other diseases) can be eliminated. If you’re in a western country, when is the last time you heard of someone (in your country) having it? Did they travel recently before* the infection?

        • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          We have West Nile that can kill people, and many other dangerous mosquito borne illnesses are expanding.

          Predators have other effective methods to prevent them from killing people.

          But I mean I don’t really think it would be appropriate to have lions in major cities either, so you? Unless measures could be developed to coexist and keep people safe.

          If you’re really passionate about mosquitoes existing in cities for some reason and can develop alternatives that keep people safe then go for it. But despite decades of work on this topic, we’re not there yet and killing mosquitoes remains an important part of disease control in most parts of the world. The way Malaria was eliminated from large regions in the first place was through widespread poisoning of mosquitoes, so that example really doesn’t help your case.